Sessionboard vs Whova

Whova packages registration, a mobile app, and abstract submission for association conferences.

Trusted by teams running Informa, FT Live, medical societies, and global enterprises
Informa
Clarion Events
Financial Times
Dynatrace
ACEP
AVIXA
NACD
ASHG
American Society of Anesthesiologists
Google
Docebo
NRECA
CyberRisk Alliance
AdventHealth
Questex
IAAPA Expo
NAEYC
Informa
Clarion Events
Financial Times
Dynatrace
ACEP
AVIXA
NACD
ASHG
American Society of Anesthesiologists
Google
Docebo
NRECA
CyberRisk Alliance
AdventHealth
Questex
IAAPA Expo
NAEYC

Quick answer

Whova is an all-in-one event platform — registration, mobile app, agenda, and basic abstract submission for associations and conferences. Sessionboard displaces Whova on the program layer when multi-round review, speaker CRM, transcription, Attendee Hub, and Advocacy matter. Whova fits smaller meetings wanting one vendor; Sessionboard fits medical, scientific, and multi-track events where program depth beats app-first packaging.

Sound like your team?

Match your role to the job Sessionboard solves — program ops, content reuse, or marketing attribution.

Abstract committee chair

Whova abstract forms exist — multi-round review and chair workflow still happen outside the product.

Speaker operations manager

Speaker portal is thin — you need materials, bios, and agenda truth from acceptance through show day.

VP Marketing

App engagement metrics without registration attribution — Advocacy needs tracked faculty shares.

Scientific program director

500+ abstracts and 50+ reviewers — you need committee ops, not app-first abstract intake.

Why teams choose Sessionboard

What Whova does well — and where Sessionboard is the better fit for program teams.

Whova — limited fit

  • All-in-one packaging

    Registration, mobile app, and agenda in one contract for mid-market associations.

  • Attendee mobile app

    Branded app, networking, and agenda for smaller conferences.

  • Faster time-to-app

    App-first buyers who prioritize launch speed over review depth.

When to stay

  • Under 200 abstracts, one review pass, and mobile app is the primary buying criteria
  • Single-vendor mandate with no post-meeting content or advocacy requirements

Sessionboard — program, CRM & content

  • Multi-round abstract and committee ops

    Chair workflows, COI capture, and rubrics — not lightweight submission forms only.

  • Speaker CRM year over year

    Faculty history persists across annual cycles — not reset when the next Whova event opens.

  • Content marketing and Advocacy

    Transcription, Attendee Hub, Create, and tracked peer shares on the session graph.

When Sessionboard wins

  • Medical or scientific congress with formal peer review
  • Speaker CRM and materials pipeline beyond basic abstract intake
  • Post-event transcription, clips, and Attendee Hub required
  • Faculty and sponsor shares need registration attribution

What Sessionboard owns

Program, speaker CRM, content — plus Advocacy and Dispatch marketing tools competitors treat as afterthoughts.

Program layer

Call for papers (CFP), multi-round review, chair workflows, conflict of interest (COI) tracking, and published agenda — work competitors leave in spreadsheets.

Speaker CRM

One faculty record: portal, bio, materials, and communications across years — not a fresh CSV every submission cycle.

Content marketing

Live transcription, Media Library, clips, Attendee Hub, and Create on the session record you already manage.

Advocacy

Peer shares from speakers, sponsors, and faculty — tracked links to registration when sessions are accepted or confirmed.

Dispatch

Internal team distribution — automated share recipes for staff when content is ready, beside Hootsuite or Sprout for always-on social.

Ask your AI about the event — not a spreadsheet export

Sessionboard connects to the assistants your team already uses through MCP (Model Context Protocol). Sessions, speakers, and agenda data stay in Sessionboard — Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot read it live.

Connect in minutes

Sign in with OAuth — no API keys to copy. Ask about session status, speaker readiness, committee progress, or agenda gaps in plain English.

MCP setup guide →

Works beside your stack

Registration and capture tools stay in place. Sessionboard holds the program graph — sync transcripts and media back when you run another vendor beside us.

API & coexistence overview →

Evaluating Whova alternatives?

See how Sessionboard fits beside your existing stack — no rip-and-replace required.

Request a demo

Where Sessionboard displaces Whova

Honest split: what stays on their contract vs what moves to Sessionboard when you need program depth, speaker CRM, and content marketing.

Whova — their lane

  • Whova mobile app mid-contract while registration migrates separately

Sessionboard — your advantage

  • Call for papers, committee review, speaker portal, and program build
  • Transcription, Attendee Hub, Advocacy, and Dispatch
  • Authoritative program graph — export or sync to any app vendor if needed

Frequently asked questions

Evaluating Sessionboard against Whova for the program layer — not a forced rip-and-replace.

Often on the program layer — yes. Some teams keep a mobile app vendor and run Sessionboard as system of record for sessions and speakers.

Sessionboard publishes the program graph; app vendors consume via export or integration — same pattern as Sherpa coexistence.

Sessionboard replaces review workflow and speaker ops that Whova abstract modules do not cover in depth.

Teams with 500+ abstracts and formal committees typically need Sessionboard program depth — not app-first tooling alone.

Pilot one meeting on Sessionboard for CFP and speaker ops; keep registration elsewhere until renewal.

Evaluating Whova alternatives?

Talk through your event workflow — abstracts, speakers, content, and marketing on one program graph.

Loading form…