Why Your Call for Speakers Isn’t Delivering the Content You Need

Every organizer knows the feeling.

You launch your call for speakers, the submissions start rolling in, and… something feels off.

The topics are all over the place. Some proposals don’t match your event theme. Others read like sales pitches. A few are great — but buried under a mountain of filler content and half-finished abstracts.

You were hoping for a flood of inspiring, relevant ideas. Instead, you got a pile of work for reviewers and a headache for your team.

The problem usually isn’t the speakers themselves. It’s the process.

When submission forms are vague, criteria unclear, and evaluations inconsistent, even strong contributors struggle to hit the mark.

The good news? It’s fixable.

By setting clearer expectations, adding structure to your submission process, and giving reviewers the right tools, you can transform your call for speakers from a guessing game into a consistent stream of quality content.

Why It Happens

Most teams put enormous effort into promoting their call for speakers, but far less into how it actually works once proposals start coming in. The result is a system that collects volume instead of quality.

Here’s what usually goes wrong:

1. Vague submission forms

When your form doesn’t define what a great session looks like, people guess. You end up with submissions that don’t align with your event’s goals, tone, or audience. Speakers can’t deliver relevant content if they don’t know what “relevant” means.

2. No clear evaluation criteria

If reviewers don’t have a rubric or shared scoring framework, evaluations become subjective. One reviewer’s “strong” might be another’s “average,” and promising ideas get lost in inconsistency.

3. Poor communication loops

Speakers submit once and hope for the best. Reviewers give feedback, but it rarely circles back. Without visibility into progress or expectations, both sides end up frustrated.

4. Manual and disconnected workflows

Emails, spreadsheets, and shared drives might get the job done for a handful of submissions, but not for hundreds. Files go missing, notes get buried, and version control becomes a full-time job.

5. Lack of context for reviewers

Reviewers often see abstracts without knowing the bigger picture — track goals, audience needs, or speaker history. That context gap leads to uneven scoring and missed opportunities to select the right sessions.

When all of this happens at once, even the best-intentioned call for speakers creates more work than value. It’s not that teams can’t manage the process — it’s that the process itself isn’t built for scale.

How to Fix It

The key to better submissions isn’t casting a wider net. It’s building a smarter process that guides speakers and reviewers toward the kind of content your event actually needs.

Here’s how to make it happen:

1. Start with structure

Design your submission form to reflect your event’s goals. Include clear fields for learning outcomes, session format, audience level, and topic relevance. The more specific your inputs, the stronger your submissions will be. A well-structured form does more than collect data — it shapes quality from the start.

2. Define your evaluation criteria early

Don’t wait until review season to decide how proposals will be scored. Create a rubric that aligns with your event’s mission and share it with reviewers ahead of time. When everyone applies the same standards, it’s easier to compare sessions fairly and spot the strongest ideas.

3. Centralize communication

Give speakers and reviewers a shared space to track progress and updates. Speaker portals, for example, let submitters see exactly what’s needed and when. Reviewers can leave comments, and organizers can follow up — without relying on email threads or attachments.

4. Automate the manual work

Technology should do the heavy lifting. Use tools that automatically route submissions to the right reviewers, send reminders for incomplete forms, and compile scores in real time. This frees your team to focus on programming quality instead of administrative cleanup.

5. Give reviewers context

Connect each submission to your tracks, themes, and goals. Tools like Sessionboard’s Evaluations feature make this easy by surfacing speaker history, topics, and related sessions. With the full picture in view, reviewers can make better, faster decisions.

When your process is structured, clear, and connected, you don’t just get more submissions — you get better ones.

How Sessionboard Makes It Simple

Sessionboard was built for the exact challenges that make calls for speakers so difficult to manage. It gives event teams one connected workspace to collect, review, and select sessions without the chaos of spreadsheets or endless emails.

Here is how it supports each stage of the process:

Collect smarter submissions

Instead of generic forms, Sessionboard lets you build structured submission pages that capture exactly the information you need — learning objectives, tracks, session formats, and speaker details. Every proposal arrives complete and ready for review, no chasing required.

Evaluate consistently

With customizable rubrics and automated scoring, reviewers can apply your criteria fairly and efficiently. Progress is tracked in real time, and scores roll up into clear dashboards that make selection easier.

Stay connected without inbox overload

Built-in messaging and speaker portals keep communication centralized. Speakers always know what’s due, reviewers know what’s assigned, and organizers stay in control without sending a single reminder email.

Automate the follow-up

Automatic reminders, deadline notifications, and assignment routing remove the manual work that drains time from every review cycle. You can even assign reviewers based on expertise or topic tags with one click.

Use AI to scale quality

The AI Evaluations Assistant helps reviewers generate structured, bias-free feedback based on your rubric and event criteria. It saves hours while keeping scoring consistent across hundreds of submissions.

When everything flows in one connected system, teams can finally focus on curating the best content instead of managing the mess. Sessionboard doesn’t just make calls for speakers easier — it makes them smarter, faster, and more reliable.

The Bottom Line

A great event starts long before the first session — it starts with the ideas you choose to bring to the stage.

When your call for speakers process is fragmented, the best ideas get buried under confusion, inconsistencies, and manual work. But when it’s structured, transparent, and connected, every submission becomes an opportunity to strengthen your program.

With Sessionboard, event teams can collect the right information from the start, review proposals with clarity and fairness, and communicate seamlessly with speakers and reviewers. It’s everything you need to turn submissions into standout sessions — without the stress of managing it all in spreadsheets and email threads.

Stop managing chaos. Start curating better content.

👉 [Request a Demo]