.png)
Picture the week before your event opens for submissions. Your inbox already has 12 emails from speakers asking for the upload link. Your spreadsheet has three versions, and you're not sure which is the current one. And your colleague just forwarded you a speaker contract that was supposed to go out two weeks ago.
If this sounds familiar, you're not alone. For most event teams, speaker onboarding is one of the most time-intensive parts of the job, and almost none of that time goes toward improving the event. It goes toward chasing, copying, pasting, and following up.
The good news: this is one of the most measurable inefficiencies in event management. With a few numbers, you can calculate exactly how much your current process is costing you in hours, in staff capacity, and in the experience you're delivering to speakers. This post walks you through how to do that math, and what event teams are finding when they finally run it.
For most organizations, speaker onboarding looks something like this: a speaker confirms, someone sends them a welcome email, they request headshots, bios, and AV requirements through a mix of email threads and Google Forms, and someone else manually transfers everything into a master spreadsheet.
That process works — right up until it doesn't. It breaks down when you have more than a handful of speakers, when multiple team members are involved, when speakers don't respond, or when something changes. And at any kind of meaningful event, all of those things happen at once.
The core problem isn't effort — event teams work incredibly hard. The problem is that manual onboarding requires the same repetitive effort for every single speaker, every single year. There's no compound return. The 40th speaker takes just as long to onboard as the first one did.
Here's a framework you can use to estimate the cost of speaker onboarding to your team right now.
Step 1: Count your speakers. How many confirmed speakers does your event typically have? Include moderators, panelists, and keynotes, as well as anyone whose information you collect.
Step 2: Estimate time per speaker. For each speaker, add up the average time your team spends on:
That's roughly 80 minutes per speaker for a reasonably smooth process — and easily 2+ hours when things go sideways.
Step 3: Do the math.
.png)
Now divide by your team's capacity, and you'll see what that actually means in real terms. For an event with 200 speakers, that's easily 6–10 weeks of a full-time employee's time — spent entirely on logistics, not on the work that moves your event forward.
Step 4: Think about what your team could do with those hours back. That could go toward speaker relationships, programming quality, sponsor coordination, or simply breathing room before the event goes live. Most event teams, when they see this number for the first time, don't think "that's expensive they think "we could have done so much more."
The question isn't what the hours cost. It's what they're worth when you get them back.
When event teams move to a dedicated speaker management platform, the time savings are most visible in three areas:
Centralized asset collection. Instead of email threads and Google Forms feeding into a spreadsheet, speakers log into a portal and submit everything in one place. The information is automatically organized and available to the whole team.
Automated follow-up. Rather than manually chasing speakers who haven't submitted their headshot, the system sends reminders on a schedule. Your team only gets involved when there's an actual exception to handle.
Reusable speaker records. For teams that run recurring events, the biggest time sink is re-collecting information from speakers you've worked with before. A speaker CRM lets you carry that history forward — so returning speakers only need to confirm what's changed, not start from scratch.
The shift isn't just in hours saved. It's where your team's attention goes. Instead of managing logistics, they're managing relationships, which actually improve the speaker experience and make events better year over year.
The pattern we hear most often from teams who've moved off spreadsheets and email isn't about any single feature. It's about getting time back.
Education and programming teams who spent years managing speakers manually describe the shift as moving from reactive to proactive — suddenly they're thinking about speaker relationships rather than tracking down missing headshots. Organizations that ran their entire CFP process via email say the biggest surprise wasn't the time saved on any one task, but the mental load that disappeared when everything lived in one place. Multi-event teams talk about the compounding effect: every event that runs through a centralized system makes the next one faster.
The throughline is the same: the manual process wasn't failing dramatically; it was quietly consuming enormous amounts of time that could have been spent elsewhere.
If you're evaluating whether to change your speaker onboarding process, these are the questions worth sitting with before your next planning season:
The answers usually make the decision easier than you'd expect.
Speaker onboarding is one of those areas where the cost is real but invisible — it never shows up as a line item, so it never gets scrutinized. But when you run the math, the numbers are almost always surprising.
Streamlining doesn't mean eliminating the human touch. It means making sure your team's time goes toward the parts of speaker management that actually require judgment, creativity, and relationship-building — not toward copying bios into a spreadsheet for the fifteenth time.
If you want to see what this looks like in practice, we'd be happy to walk you through how other events have made the shift.
Picture the week before your event opens for submissions. Your inbox already has 12 emails from speakers asking for the upload link. Your spreadsheet has three versions, and you're not sure which is the current one. And your colleague just forwarded you a speaker contract that was supposed to go out two weeks ago.
If this sounds familiar, you're not alone. For most event teams, speaker onboarding is one of the most time-intensive parts of the job, and almost none of that time goes toward improving the event. It goes toward chasing, copying, pasting, and following up.
The good news: this is one of the most measurable inefficiencies in event management. With a few numbers, you can calculate exactly how much your current process is costing you in hours, in staff capacity, and in the experience you're delivering to speakers. This post walks you through how to do that math, and what event teams are finding when they finally run it.
For most organizations, speaker onboarding looks something like this: a speaker confirms, someone sends them a welcome email, they request headshots, bios, and AV requirements through a mix of email threads and Google Forms, and someone else manually transfers everything into a master spreadsheet.
That process works — right up until it doesn't. It breaks down when you have more than a handful of speakers, when multiple team members are involved, when speakers don't respond, or when something changes. And at any kind of meaningful event, all of those things happen at once.
The core problem isn't effort — event teams work incredibly hard. The problem is that manual onboarding requires the same repetitive effort for every single speaker, every single year. There's no compound return. The 40th speaker takes just as long to onboard as the first one did.
Here's a framework you can use to estimate the cost of speaker onboarding to your team right now.
Step 1: Count your speakers. How many confirmed speakers does your event typically have? Include moderators, panelists, and keynotes, as well as anyone whose information you collect.
Step 2: Estimate time per speaker. For each speaker, add up the average time your team spends on:
That's roughly 80 minutes per speaker for a reasonably smooth process — and easily 2+ hours when things go sideways.
Step 3: Do the math.
.png)
Now divide by your team's capacity, and you'll see what that actually means in real terms. For an event with 200 speakers, that's easily 6–10 weeks of a full-time employee's time — spent entirely on logistics, not on the work that moves your event forward.
Step 4: Think about what your team could do with those hours back. That could go toward speaker relationships, programming quality, sponsor coordination, or simply breathing room before the event goes live. Most event teams, when they see this number for the first time, don't think "that's expensive they think "we could have done so much more."
The question isn't what the hours cost. It's what they're worth when you get them back.
When event teams move to a dedicated speaker management platform, the time savings are most visible in three areas:
Centralized asset collection. Instead of email threads and Google Forms feeding into a spreadsheet, speakers log into a portal and submit everything in one place. The information is automatically organized and available to the whole team.
Automated follow-up. Rather than manually chasing speakers who haven't submitted their headshot, the system sends reminders on a schedule. Your team only gets involved when there's an actual exception to handle.
Reusable speaker records. For teams that run recurring events, the biggest time sink is re-collecting information from speakers you've worked with before. A speaker CRM lets you carry that history forward — so returning speakers only need to confirm what's changed, not start from scratch.
The shift isn't just in hours saved. It's where your team's attention goes. Instead of managing logistics, they're managing relationships, which actually improve the speaker experience and make events better year over year.
The pattern we hear most often from teams who've moved off spreadsheets and email isn't about any single feature. It's about getting time back.
Education and programming teams who spent years managing speakers manually describe the shift as moving from reactive to proactive — suddenly they're thinking about speaker relationships rather than tracking down missing headshots. Organizations that ran their entire CFP process via email say the biggest surprise wasn't the time saved on any one task, but the mental load that disappeared when everything lived in one place. Multi-event teams talk about the compounding effect: every event that runs through a centralized system makes the next one faster.
The throughline is the same: the manual process wasn't failing dramatically; it was quietly consuming enormous amounts of time that could have been spent elsewhere.
If you're evaluating whether to change your speaker onboarding process, these are the questions worth sitting with before your next planning season:
The answers usually make the decision easier than you'd expect.
Speaker onboarding is one of those areas where the cost is real but invisible — it never shows up as a line item, so it never gets scrutinized. But when you run the math, the numbers are almost always surprising.
Streamlining doesn't mean eliminating the human touch. It means making sure your team's time goes toward the parts of speaker management that actually require judgment, creativity, and relationship-building — not toward copying bios into a spreadsheet for the fifteenth time.
If you want to see what this looks like in practice, we'd be happy to walk you through how other events have made the shift.

Stay up to date with our latest news
See how real teams simplify speaker management, scale content operations, and run smoother events with Sessionboard.