.png)
We recently released A Strategic Guide For Call For Papers that included 40+ tactics packaged into 12 overarching strategies sourced from real-world interviews with 10 leading event content experts.
This guide is just a portion of the tactics and approaches event teams use in their call for papers. You might love some of the suggestions, or you might disagree. You could have a different approach entirely.
That's why we hosted an open discussion on call for papers strategy to learn from and challenge each other.
In this conversation we discussed:
-Addressing content process challenges
-Diving into the benefits of hosting a blind review process
-Speaker selection tactics
-Questions to include or exclude in your CFP
-The value of speaker training and onboarding
-Strategies to evaluate expertise in abstract submissions
-How to curate a diverse pool of speakers -and more!
✅ Be intentional with your CFP questions – Align them with your event’s goals to ensure you get quality submissions.
✅ Use structured evaluations – Blind reviews, rubrics, and speaker background research improve fairness and content quality.
✅ Invest in speaker training – Even experienced speakers can benefit from coaching and rehearsal sessions.
✅ Standardize content levels – Use Bloom’s Taxonomy or a technical review process to ensure sessions match the advertised level.
✅ Be proactive about speaker diversity – Direct outreach, inclusive CFP questions, and community partnerships help expand representation.
✅ Consider multiple CFP deadlines – Staggered calls for submissions can improve marketing traction and content freshness.
✅ Leverage attendee feedback – Use post-session evaluations to refine content selection for future events.
We recently released A Strategic Guide For Call For Papers that included 40+ tactics packaged into 12 overarching strategies sourced from real-world interviews with 10 leading event content experts.
This guide is just a portion of the tactics and approaches event teams use in their call for papers. You might love some of the suggestions, or you might disagree. You could have a different approach entirely.
That's why we hosted an open discussion on call for papers strategy to learn from and challenge each other.
In this conversation we discussed:
-Addressing content process challenges
-Diving into the benefits of hosting a blind review process
-Speaker selection tactics
-Questions to include or exclude in your CFP
-The value of speaker training and onboarding
-Strategies to evaluate expertise in abstract submissions
-How to curate a diverse pool of speakers -and more!
✅ Be intentional with your CFP questions – Align them with your event’s goals to ensure you get quality submissions.
✅ Use structured evaluations – Blind reviews, rubrics, and speaker background research improve fairness and content quality.
✅ Invest in speaker training – Even experienced speakers can benefit from coaching and rehearsal sessions.
✅ Standardize content levels – Use Bloom’s Taxonomy or a technical review process to ensure sessions match the advertised level.
✅ Be proactive about speaker diversity – Direct outreach, inclusive CFP questions, and community partnerships help expand representation.
✅ Consider multiple CFP deadlines – Staggered calls for submissions can improve marketing traction and content freshness.
✅ Leverage attendee feedback – Use post-session evaluations to refine content selection for future events.

Stay up to date with our latest news