Open Discussion: Call For Papers Strategy

Bryan Funk
October 24, 2025
60
min read

Session Overview

We recently released A Strategic Guide For Call For Papers that included 40+ tactics packaged into 12 overarching strategies sourced from real-world interviews with 10 leading event content experts.

This guide is just a portion of the tactics and approaches event teams use in their call for papers. You might love some of the suggestions, or you might disagree. You could have a different approach entirely.

That's why we hosted an open discussion on call for papers strategy to learn from and challenge each other.

In this conversation we discussed:

-Addressing content process challenges

-Diving into the benefits of hosting a blind review process

-Speaker selection tactics

-Questions to include or exclude in your CFP

-The value of speaker training and onboarding

-Strategies to evaluate expertise in abstract submissions

-How to curate a diverse pool of speakers -and more!

Highlights from the Discussion

1. Challenges in the Call for Papers Process

  • Asking the right questions: If you don’t ask the right questions in your CFP process, you risk getting irrelevant or low-quality submissions.
  • Ensuring fairness & alignment: Submissions should align with both audience needs and company strategy.
  • Streamlining the submission process: Reducing friction while still collecting necessary details.
  • Avoiding repetition & stale content: Preventing speakers from submitting the same session year after year.

2. Evaluation & Selection Strategies

  • Blind evaluation process: Some organizations review session proposals without speaker names to ensure unbiased content selection.
  • Use of a rubric: Numeric scoring systems help keep evaluations objective.
  • Tracking speaker performance: Using session feedback, prior presentation experience, and LinkedIn research to assess speaker credibility.
  • Speaker background checks: Some teams manually check LinkedIn and past contributions before selecting speakers.

3. Improving Speaker Training & Performance

  • Speaker coaching: Many teams conduct pre-event speaker training to improve presentation skills.
  • Pre-event dry runs: Reviewing first few slides or conducting a mock presentation for new speakers.
  • Mandatory training: Some organizations require extensive training (e.g., Dreamforce has an 8-hour speaker training course).
  • Rebranding training as ‘Rehearsal’: Positioning it as a practice session to increase participation and reduce anxiety.
  • Leveraging AI tools for speaker rehearsal: AI-powered rehearsal platforms help speakers refine their delivery.

4. Content Categorization & Audience Expectations

  • Clarifying content levels: "Beginner," "Intermediate," and "Advanced" mean different things to different people.
  • Using Bloom’s Taxonomy: Evaluating learning objectives based on action verbs to classify session levels more accurately.
  • Adding a technical review process: Internal subject matter experts validate content levels before the event.
  • Gathering attendee feedback on content levels: Surveys ensure the session meets expectations.

5. Managing Speaker Diversity & Representation

  • Direct outreach to diverse communities: Engaging associations and affinity groups (e.g., Black Pet Business Owners Network).
  • Self-identification in speaker applications: Adding a question about diversity without requiring detailed demographic data.
  • Committee involvement: Task forces help vet and encourage more diverse speakers.

6. Structuring the Call for Papers Timeline

  • Setting deadlines instead of open CFPs: Rolling submission rounds create urgency and improve submission quality.
  • Leaving program gaps for last-minute content: AI and tech conferences delay some speaker selections to ensure content remains relevant.
  • Segmenting the CFP into multiple rounds: Announcing sessions in phases builds marketing momentum.

7. Crowdsourcing & Community Involvement

  • Letting attendees suggest topics and speakers: Collecting input via session evaluations.
  • Upvoting session ideas: Some teams experiment with letting communities vote on suggested content.
  • Post-event follow-ups: Encouraging strong speakers to expand their topics into a series or additional content formats.

Key Takeaways & Actionable Learnings

Be intentional with your CFP questions – Align them with your event’s goals to ensure you get quality submissions.
Use structured evaluations – Blind reviews, rubrics, and speaker background research improve fairness and content quality.
Invest in speaker training – Even experienced speakers can benefit from coaching and rehearsal sessions.
Standardize content levels – Use Bloom’s Taxonomy or a technical review process to ensure sessions match the advertised level.
Be proactive about speaker diversity – Direct outreach, inclusive CFP questions, and community partnerships help expand representation.
Consider multiple CFP deadlines – Staggered calls for submissions can improve marketing traction and content freshness.
Leverage attendee feedback – Use post-session evaluations to refine content selection for future events.

time-icon
60
min. recording watch time

Open Discussion: Call For Papers Strategy

26 event content professionals came together to discuss challenges and share solutions for their call for papers strategies.

Session Overview

We recently released A Strategic Guide For Call For Papers that included 40+ tactics packaged into 12 overarching strategies sourced from real-world interviews with 10 leading event content experts.

This guide is just a portion of the tactics and approaches event teams use in their call for papers. You might love some of the suggestions, or you might disagree. You could have a different approach entirely.

That's why we hosted an open discussion on call for papers strategy to learn from and challenge each other.

In this conversation we discussed:

-Addressing content process challenges

-Diving into the benefits of hosting a blind review process

-Speaker selection tactics

-Questions to include or exclude in your CFP

-The value of speaker training and onboarding

-Strategies to evaluate expertise in abstract submissions

-How to curate a diverse pool of speakers -and more!

Highlights from the Discussion

1. Challenges in the Call for Papers Process

  • Asking the right questions: If you don’t ask the right questions in your CFP process, you risk getting irrelevant or low-quality submissions.
  • Ensuring fairness & alignment: Submissions should align with both audience needs and company strategy.
  • Streamlining the submission process: Reducing friction while still collecting necessary details.
  • Avoiding repetition & stale content: Preventing speakers from submitting the same session year after year.

2. Evaluation & Selection Strategies

  • Blind evaluation process: Some organizations review session proposals without speaker names to ensure unbiased content selection.
  • Use of a rubric: Numeric scoring systems help keep evaluations objective.
  • Tracking speaker performance: Using session feedback, prior presentation experience, and LinkedIn research to assess speaker credibility.
  • Speaker background checks: Some teams manually check LinkedIn and past contributions before selecting speakers.

3. Improving Speaker Training & Performance

  • Speaker coaching: Many teams conduct pre-event speaker training to improve presentation skills.
  • Pre-event dry runs: Reviewing first few slides or conducting a mock presentation for new speakers.
  • Mandatory training: Some organizations require extensive training (e.g., Dreamforce has an 8-hour speaker training course).
  • Rebranding training as ‘Rehearsal’: Positioning it as a practice session to increase participation and reduce anxiety.
  • Leveraging AI tools for speaker rehearsal: AI-powered rehearsal platforms help speakers refine their delivery.

4. Content Categorization & Audience Expectations

  • Clarifying content levels: "Beginner," "Intermediate," and "Advanced" mean different things to different people.
  • Using Bloom’s Taxonomy: Evaluating learning objectives based on action verbs to classify session levels more accurately.
  • Adding a technical review process: Internal subject matter experts validate content levels before the event.
  • Gathering attendee feedback on content levels: Surveys ensure the session meets expectations.

5. Managing Speaker Diversity & Representation

  • Direct outreach to diverse communities: Engaging associations and affinity groups (e.g., Black Pet Business Owners Network).
  • Self-identification in speaker applications: Adding a question about diversity without requiring detailed demographic data.
  • Committee involvement: Task forces help vet and encourage more diverse speakers.

6. Structuring the Call for Papers Timeline

  • Setting deadlines instead of open CFPs: Rolling submission rounds create urgency and improve submission quality.
  • Leaving program gaps for last-minute content: AI and tech conferences delay some speaker selections to ensure content remains relevant.
  • Segmenting the CFP into multiple rounds: Announcing sessions in phases builds marketing momentum.

7. Crowdsourcing & Community Involvement

  • Letting attendees suggest topics and speakers: Collecting input via session evaluations.
  • Upvoting session ideas: Some teams experiment with letting communities vote on suggested content.
  • Post-event follow-ups: Encouraging strong speakers to expand their topics into a series or additional content formats.

Key Takeaways & Actionable Learnings

Be intentional with your CFP questions – Align them with your event’s goals to ensure you get quality submissions.
Use structured evaluations – Blind reviews, rubrics, and speaker background research improve fairness and content quality.
Invest in speaker training – Even experienced speakers can benefit from coaching and rehearsal sessions.
Standardize content levels – Use Bloom’s Taxonomy or a technical review process to ensure sessions match the advertised level.
Be proactive about speaker diversity – Direct outreach, inclusive CFP questions, and community partnerships help expand representation.
Consider multiple CFP deadlines – Staggered calls for submissions can improve marketing traction and content freshness.
Leverage attendee feedback – Use post-session evaluations to refine content selection for future events.

Sign up for our newsletter

Stay up to date with our latest news

Subscribe to product updates
Subscription confirmed.
Something went wrong. Please try again later.